Texas Hold ‘Em Poker Tournament

March 30, 2009

Art Of Blind Steals: Part 5.

Filed under: MTTs, Preflop — Tags: , , — MikeTheMavrick @ 3:22 am

Some people consider stealing a pot with limpers preflop to be a blind steal attempt. I love to make this move if my table is passive, fairly tight, not tricky, and I have a somewhat decent hand.

If I had JT offsuit after a few limpers, it is a perfectly fine hand to limp in with in late position if I’m unlikely to get raised. There’s nothing wrong with that play. There’s also nothing wrong with folding it if players on the button or the blinds are aggressive, or if you want to start to create a tight image. However, since it’s not suited, I don’t care if I get raised off of it by the blinds or a limper. If I raise fairly large here, it’s pretty unlikely that people will limp and call a raise with a jack, and definitely not a ten. If they had AJ they are fairly likely to raise preflop, and if they have king jack and limp in they’re probably ready to fold since they are out of position facing a raise. Of course many lower stake games, and really loose games will definitely limp call with ace jack, so forget this play in that situation. I’m making this play hoping I’m not dominated when I get called.

Remember I’m not just raising 3 times the big blind here, I’m generally going to be raising 3 plus 1 for every person who limped or maybe even 1.5 per every limper. Sometimes even 2. Generally you might need to kick up the raise amount since your opponents are getting good odds to call. When I make a big steal attempt OVER limpers, I’m more focused on how large the pot is. I might think about raising 2.5-3.5 times the pot, but on rare occasion I might make the 4 times the pot raise. People often make larger raises with JJ and TT and maybe AK, so this raise is going to represent a realistic hand. People will generally not be afraid that someone has aces because they just won’t believe them. But a raise like this represents a realistic hand.

If my opponents just limp in, they’re probably just going to call or fold the raise. So lets say the blinds are 50/100. 2 people limp in, but they’ve been doing it a lot, AND they’ve done it from late position. There’s now 350 in the pot. I could make it 600-1500 here and easily take it down.

So I raise maybe 800. If I occasionally decide to make the biggest raise I’ll make up to 1400, it is only because I have a healthy stack, and because it’s worth setting up the image so I get action when I have a hand.

If my opponents reraise me a bunch, I can fold, but when I have a hand and make that play, I can make a small minimum rereraise, create a huge pot, and get them pot committed to call on the flop and soon all of his chips are going my way. Although I might raise a large amount, when I’m playing a BIG pot for most or all of my chips, I usually have a monster hand. So If I have maybe 12,000 or more, I have no problem making that play raising to 1400. Never more than 15% of my stack if it’s a 4 times raise. The raise is set up where if I’m raised to 3200, I can either move all in, or just make it like 6800 or just a little more and my opponent will have to only call 3600 with 10,000 in the pot. My opponent not only will think that he’s getting the right pot odds to call now getting nearly 3:1, BUT I will probably have Aces or Kings meaning he doesn’t have the odds… But then he will say, “well if I call I’m going to be committed to call, so I have to move all in” What’s more, once the flop comes, with half of my money in the pot already, there’s no way I can give my opponent the implied odds to beat me.

The reason this large raise works is because your opponents are much less likely to try to play back at you, and when they do, you could have a big hand and they’re going to get themselves pot committed. Most of them know that at some level. But If they just call, even if they call half the time, you would still have to be a pretty big dog for it to be unprofitable for you because you’ve taken control.

My game advanced more than any other point in my career overnight when I started focusing on making moves that fit in with the style of keeping it the right size.

Anything over 15% is the wrong size. That doesnt mean you throw out raises that are over 15% completely, but you just make sure you have a good hand such a high percentage of the time, that your steals that are more than 15% are super effective.

You have to make sure that your raises don’t give anything away. Every so often, change your bet from 3 big blinds, to 4 or 5 big blinds to 2.5 big blinds, to 3 times the pot, to 2 times the pot. The bigger raise might be bigger than anything you’ve made, but if you’re someone that raises smaller than average one hand, then larger than average, a bigger bet still doesn’t stand out that much, because you just look like an unpredictable player unless you’ve been playing too many hands…

Of course if you play too tight when you become shorter stacked, you won’t be able to survive either, and that’s why it’s nice to have this play in your arsenal. Many times because the blinds are always rising, it is better to pass up a steal attmpt that will only win you the small and big blind in order to wait a rotation or even a few, so that when the blinds go up a level or two you have more credibility and not only is an individual steal attempt worth more, but now you can get away with winning more in terms of big blinds as well. You can make up for the opportunity you gave up and then some because of the credibility you’ve gained. Not only does it allow you to win a few big blinds, but you still potentially can win even more if you’re just called and you win on or after the flop. In addition, if you pick up a big hand later, it’s more likely you can get a lot more out of it.

Keep these ideas in mind, and you should find yourself advancing deeper in tournaments without taking on as many major* risks.

March 26, 2009

Blind-Stealing In Poker Tournaments – 5 Common Mistakes And How To Avoid Them

Filed under: General, Mark R Holland — Tags: , , , — MarksEzineArticles @ 6:27 pm

Blind-Stealing In Poker Tournaments – 5 Common Mistakes And How To Avoid Them
By Mark R. Holland 

In poker tournament games the blinds and antes will increase rapidly the longer you play. Since premium hands do not come along too often, ’stealing’ these by raising from late position becomes a critical strategy to maintain you chip stack.

However many players make mistakes in blind steals which actually end up costing chips instead of accumulating them. This article looks at these common mistakes and advises on how to ensure that you win more blinds than you lose.

1) Is The Reward Worth It?

Stealing blinds too early in a poker tournament is rarely worth the risk. Yet many players do this in the early rounds. When the levels are 10 / 20 chips (for example) the benefit is not worth the chances of running into a big hand. Instead wait until there are enough chips to cover 10% to 15% of your stack on the table.

2) Not Every Time!

Some players will attempt to take the blinds every time they are folded to in later position. This is asking for even the most passive player to make a stand with a large (and expensive to call) re-raise. Randomizing your steals or just folding one time in three can help to prevent this from happening.

3) Beware Of The Small Stacks!

An opponent with 5 to 8 times the pot in their stack will be feeling desperate. Sometimes so desperate that they are looking to make a stand with any reasonable holding. If you raise 3 times from the button and a small stack raises all-in you will often have to call, the huge pot odds making this a positive equity play. Avoid this situation by ensuring that you have at least a reasonable hand when there are very short stacks to act behind you.

4) Beware Of The Large Stacks!

How does facing a re-raise from a very large stack sound? This can be a disaster when calling would cost half of your stack and your hand is marginal. Big stacks will often make a stand when repeatedly stolen from and caution is advised when raising from late position under these circumstances.

5) Raise Enough To Get The Job Done!

Tight players to act behind you is a real benefit in when adding yet another set of blinds and antes to your stack! Yet many players make their raises too large under these circumstances. This costs more chips than necessary those times you are called (or even raised). Make sure you bet only enough to ‘get the job done’ from 2.5 to 3 times the current big blind is usually plenty enough.

Mark R Holland is an online poker pro, blogger and writer for high-quality poker sites. For great poker strategy articles and tips covering SNGs, Poker Tournaments and Satellite Qualifiers visit Online Poker Tournaments today!

MZone Tournament Strategy – A Sense for Timing

Filed under: General, Marty Smith — Tags: , , — Marty @ 6:26 pm

MZone Tournament Strategy – A Sense for Timing
By Marty Smith 

Professional players talk about it all the time. It’s about having good timing in a tournament for a bluff, a re-raise, a squeeze play, a tough fold or an all-in call. But having good timing isn’t really something you learn about away from the table, it comes with hours and hours and buy-in after buy-in as part of your dues paid on the felt.

In that sense it is hard for amateurs and even more so for new players to emulate the good timing of their favorite professional players often exhibited in big-money, televised tournaments like the WSOP and WPT. Certainly there is a level of intuition involved that comes from talent, experience, patience and just a knack for reading opponents. None of this will come easy for a new online player, but there are strategies a rookie can learn to use while building his skill and bankroll so that eventually, a sense of timing is a natural part of arsenal.

Profiling. Learn to profile your opponents in every tournament, at every table you are at. By profiling I mean using a color system (if you don’t have software), or profile icons (like the ones used in tournament indicator), to identify and predict the motives and moves your opponent may make, even before he makes them.

Putting your opponent on a hand. This is something that you absolutely must try to do whether you are in a hand or not. When you can put your opponent on a range of hands, 3 of 4 times, you will start to see the benefits of this through well-times bluffs, pushes, and calls. It takes practice. Lots of practice, but you are going to experience some pure poker joy when your opponents start flipping over the exact hole cards you thought he had. And it WILL happen!

Knowing the Tournament Structure. Not just knowing, but understanding is probably better stated. What is the payout and how far from the money are you? When are the blinds going up? How is the structure affecting the play of others?

Understanding your M and Q. If you don’t know these, in particular your M and thus your MZone, you have very little chance to make well timed plays in poker tournaments As your M becomes more critical, as with your opponents’ M, there is far less predictability about anyone’s play and this must factor in to your decision making.

The next time you see a professional on TV make a well timed play, not only has he used in intuitive experience, but also has calculated these factors above to help support his decision. So learning these and making them part of your game, every game, is where you need to start.

Marty Smith has video reviews of all the online poker calculators so you can see them being used before you decide which one is right for you. He also has a poker tournament strategy video series that is free just for signing up.

March 25, 2009

The Art Of Blind Steals: Part 4

Filed under: General, MTTs, Preflop — Tags: , , — MikeTheMavrick @ 3:22 am

Stealing the blinds requires an artistic talent. So far this series has only talked about more card oriented strategies. However they have focused on how those strategies differ according to your table. But as you get better at figuring out your table as a whole, it’s time to focus in on more individual players.

The biggest thing with stealing the blinds is observation.

  • The very first thing you want to determine when stealing the blinds, is who is playing tight.
  • The second thing you want to determine is who perceives you as someone who only raises with a big hand.
  • Once you identify those players, you’ll still need to be aware of who is left to act in between those players. It does no good to attempt a steal if you have a loose player to your immediate left.

It can be difficult to track everyone at the tournament table. But as mentioned, before you can steal someone’s blinds, you have to identify the playing styles of the closest players to you. For that reason, you should first focus on the first 2 positions to my left.

Although for many people 2 doesn’t seem like a lot, There are many other things going on. You still have to be looking for major mistakes that any of your opponents seem to be making. Any large bets that stand out, or disproportional bets. Also, you should always have your eye out for any player that fits the right characteristics in the Full Tilt Player Notes Classification System, so you can isolate players that are passive and respond accordingly.

In addition, although your focus is the players to your left at the moment, you still have to at least at some level be aware of anyone to your right, to really know what opponents like to raise a lot, so you can shift from a “steal” mentality, to a resteal mentality. We will cover resteals later, but for now, just know that in a steal mentality the focus is the players to your left, with the 2 players to your right in the back of your mind. Also, if you cannot steal blinds from late position, or resteal, because your opponents are focused on position, then you may need to attempt a blind steal on the players to your right as the first person or second player to act.

It’s really a lot to watch, but with practice you will get better at it.

The best player to be up against is someone who is tight passive all the way through. Not only do you have the chance to steal, but if it fails, he won’t reraise you, and he will generally give you a free look to the river, or opportunity to bluff. If you actually have a decent hand on the flop, you might be better off checking and trying to draw out on your opponent, or at least not risking many chips. The 2nd best, unless you are short stacked, in my opinion is actually loose passive.

A blind steal doesn’t neccesarily need to succeed often. If it doesn’t succeed, you simply need a way to gain chips to make up for the failed attempts. You should prefer loose passive over tight aggressive. The reason is because you isolate yourself with a player that will pay you off if you hit, he still may fold, but if he doesn’t fold you can just check your way to the river.

If your opponent is loose passive preflop and tight post flop, it’s even better. The combination of both allows you to build up the pot to a size you can tolerate, enough to isolate you and the loose player. After the flop you can make a relatively smaller bet and he will fold often enough where you can really bennefit. The only other style you might steal from is tight aggressive. Loose aggressive opponents are not someone you want to steal from… You may raise with hands that you intend on folding, but only to set your opponent up so you can win a big pot with a big hand so when he reraises you, you can move in over the top, but you are not stealing.

Be on the look out for the right player styles, starting with the two players to your left, and you will find yourself winning more chips with less risk, which will allow you to do better in tournaments.

March 24, 2009

Poker Calculators and Multi-Table Tournament Strategies

Filed under: Marty Smith — Tags: , — Marty @ 6:42 pm

Poker Calculators and Multi-Table Tournament Strategies
By Marty Smith 

There isn’t a poker calculator designed for multi table tournament (MTT) advice specifically, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be using one. In fact, I have used Hold’em Pirate for MTT’s exclusively and have reached a higher amount of final tables while doing so. Hold’em Pirate instructions don’t really mention it’s use in MTT’s, but you are reading this now because I have found through experience that Hold’em Pirate is excellent for MTT’s in assisting you with monitoring the table dynamics, measuring your true hand strength, and picking your spots against aggressive players.
Having a good feel for your table’s momentum or dynamics can help you combat an endless run of lousy cards.

Taking down incidental, non-contested pots is the key to survival and tournament advances. But that requires intuitive information. If you use Hold’em Pirate like I do, the VPIP meter is invaluable in that regard. At a glance you know how your “collective table” is acting and how that is affecting the contested pots. So if you are not in position, or not getting pot odds, you are better off staying out of the action with a high VPIP table rating. On the other hand, a low (tight) VPIP rating with offer up ample opportunity to take down a lot of small pots while building an aggressive image for yourself.

Certain factors in MTT play have inherent value on your hole cards. AKos is much more powerful when you are a big stack, as compared to when you are amongst the short stacks and playing on the bubble. This exact situation happened to me last week in the Party Poker Million. I folded the AKos after an early position raise from a big stack, and a re-raise from another big stack. I felt my hand was at least counterfeited, and surely, I must have been up against at least a pair Queens. It was really a question of $500 bucks. I was short enough to know I was out of contention for big money, so I decided to go for some money. But knowing the true strength of my AKos in that spot was how I folded.

You are bound to run up against those aggressive type tournament players who are always in your face with pressure betting. They may be very good, but they may also be maniacs. Both are dangerous. Either way you need to know the VPIP meter in order to identify them. For example, if you are in late position and considering answering a 3x blind raise from, oh let’s say, DuecesCrazy99, all you have to do is check the VPIP meter. You can see that DuecesCrazy99 came into 68% of the pots, raised 40% of those times, and bet out at the flop 100% of the time! Even if you were on an extended coffee break sitting out, you will know from those numbers you are dealing with a maniac. A tournament pro, will probably be more selective than that, and pre-flop raise more, but will have a higher pot win rate.

As with most empirical poker calculators, Hold’em Pirate is like having a pro like Chris Ferguson or Dan Harrington over your shoulder offering up guidance when you need it.

Marty Smith is webmaster of Poker Calculator Report.com where all the online poker calculators are tested and reviewed, including Sit and Go Shark, Calculatem Pro, and Poker Spy. He is also editor of PokerBookReport.com. You can contact Martin Smith at support@PokerCalculatorReport.com

Poker Strategy – How To Defend Against The Continuation Bet

Filed under: Mark R Holland — Tags: , , , — MarksEzineArticles @ 6:42 pm

Poker Strategy – How To Defend Against The Continuation Bet
By Mark R. Holland 

Continuation betting is a powerful strategy in Texas Holdem poker in which the player who raised before the flop bets out regardless of whether their hand has improved. The reason that this works is that most players will miss most flops – and the representation of strength through a bet will usually make people fold on those occasions that they missed.

Defending against the continuation bet in poker can be difficult, especially if your opponent is experienced enough to make the same bets when they have a strong hand. Defense is possible only when you are aware that your opponent may be betting with ‘nothing’ after the flop. If you can spot the times when this is likely it is possible to put in a raise which may well take the pot immediately – or to call and look to take the pot after the turn should your opponent show weakness.

The first way to determine whether your opponent is continuation betting is to have a good understanding of the right circumstances for these bets. If factors such as the number of opponents, position, flop texture and table image are all favorable then there is a high chance that the bet you face is a continuation bet.

Many opponents will give away the purpose of their bets with either their size or length of time it takes to make them. For example if you have noticed an opponent always bets the size of the pot when strong, and half of the pot size when weak – then you are in a very profitable situation. Making notes on what the sizes of your opponent’s betting patterns mean is one key to winning in Texas Holdem Poker.

How active your opponent has been lately can also be used to determine whether they have a strong hand or are continuation betting. If a very tight opponent suddenly raises before and after the flop there is a strong chance that they have at least an over-pair or top-pair type hand. Stay out of the pot in these circumstances!

Once you have determined that it is likely your opponent is ‘making a move’ for the pot after the flop, rather than showing real strength, you will need to determine the best defense. There are two methods of doing this – the flat call and the re-raise.

The flat call has the advantage that the pot is kept reasonably small. What you are looking for is your opponent’s reaction to your call after the turn. Many players will try and win the pot cheaply on the flop if they missed their hand but will give up if they are called. This means that you can bet out to take the pot on the turn if your opponent checks to you.

Raising on the flop is the more aggressive play. Success here depends on several factors including the number of opponents left to act behind you and the texture of the flop. If you are fairly sure, due to bet size or a timing (or physical) ‘tell’, that your opponent is bluffing then the raising defense can have several benefits. Not only will you often win a big pot immediately, but your opponents may be less likely to continuation bet later in the game when you are in the hand. The downside of raising here is that, if you are wrong, you will sometimes loose a big pot when folding would have kept losses to a minimum.

Mark Holland is an online poker pro and publisher of quality strategy articles on a wide range of poker variations. For profitable insights into Poker Strategy for all forms of Online Poker Tournaments check out his work today!

Art of the Blind Steals: Part 3.

Filed under: MTTs, Preflop — Tags: , , — MikeTheMavrick @ 6:12 pm

Blind steals are important in tournaments.  But not all blind steals are created equal.  Generally you should be much less likely to steal at aggressive tables, and you should play tighter to avoid taking risks and being forced into tough situations.  Part two more specifically centered on dealing with aggressive tables, now we will center on passive tables.

Against passive opponents you can steal with mch more hands, even if the opponents are slightly looser.  The reason is, if you are unsuccessful, your hand still has value and you cann check it down to the river.  While ace high probably doesn’t play as good down to 5 cards as it does after 3, you at least have the advantage to avoid trouble when you hit your ace, and possibly check down against a pair like kings and have 2 more cards to hit your ace. Against passive opponents, a raise usually means a lot of strength.

Suited Connectors- These are great for stealing the blinds at passive tables. The only disadvantage is many passive tables will raise when they have a hand like aces.  Unfortunately against aces you absolutely want to be able to call, hit the perfect flop and bust them for all of their chips. So you don’t ALWAYS want to raise.  You can certainly try a “delayed steal” or if you have over 60 big blinds the “ministeal) The delayed steal is where you limp in, with the intention to steal on the flop, and the ministeal is where you make a minraise with the intention to steal a low percentage of the time, recognizing that your hand still has a lot of value when the steal attempt is called. A normal steal attempt is perfectly fine here though.  You may miss out on the ability to crack aces, but you attempt a steal, and you’re called, but then you get to see all 5 cards.  When you DO hit, you can bet small amounts, and if your opponent calls 2 bets, he’ll probably call a larger bet on the river. A perfect hand to steal because it isn’t one where you’re raising to get value from, but if you do get called, you can easily recognize when your hand does have value.  Generally check down everything, unless you hit two pair or better, then bet.  You may decide to make 1 small bet on the river if you have a medium pair, and there aren’t a lot of overcards, but only bet an amount that ace high, or a low pair would call. These do NOT have much value when you are shorter stacked because when you hit you won’t be able to extract value as much.

Suited broadway cards – These hands are better than  suited connectors, but they’re slightly more dangerous.  If you hit top pair, it’s more likely that say your Q9 with a pair of queens is the best hand, but if it’s not, you’re in trouble, and you could easily be up gainst KQ or AQ.  Just procede more cautiously than normal if you hit top pair, and play this like you hit a pair with suited connectors.  Check it down, then bet the river.  You may put 2 really small bets in on both the turn and river, or minbet the flop, check the turn and bet the river. Or just minbet every street.  You can bet slightly more because if your opponent has a middle pair, he also will call, if he has 2nd or 3rd pair he may call if you check to the river, and you don’t only want to bet when your hand is defniately the best hand otherwise your opponents are going to figure you out.  These are playable at passive tables.

Unsuited broadway – This is actually a playable hand in passive games. It has some significant value.  It doesn’t play quite as well to 5 cards as it does to 3, but it’s a strong hand that you probably won’t get raised off of, and as long as you don’t get carried away with top pair, you can actually bet preflop for value. You want to make a very small bet to give your opponents the right price to call hands that they’ll be uncomfortable with.  Maybe they call with 98 offsuit and they’ll hit their 8 when you hit your ten with a king kicker.  They will call your small bets down and you’ll get paid off. Maybe you’ll hit two pair with KT and your opponent will have KJ and he’ll pay you off.  Maybe your opponent will slow play AK and you’ll flop a straight and get a lot of chips. This is a marginal hand with marginal value, but in passive games you can find ways to get value out of it.  But you can steal knowing that you might get called with a lower pair and be ni a coinflip situation, or you might get called being dominated, but you won’t be forced to risk all of your chips because your opponent will play passively, and you will procede cautiously.  These are probably slightly more valuable than suited connectors when you are shorter stacked, but slightly less value when deeper stacked.

Suited king – This hand is going to have some value in a passive table regardless of whether you are somewhat short stacked or very deep stacked. Not as good as the suited ace, but slightly less likely to be dominated than a suited ace. If you’re short stacked and hit your king, you have to try to extract some value, if you are deeps tacked procede cautiously.  Deep stacked you are looking for two pair, or flush possibilities. short stacked you just want to hit a decent draw and/or a pair.

Any ace or king- this hand does not have much value in stealing unless you are shorter stacked, so that you are willing to play on a bluff all in with a couple overcards, or a straightdraw with an overcard to the board, and you’re willing to get it all in with top pair, at a passive table this will be rare. It may be a good ministeal hand when you minraise because ace high is probably the best hand, and if you can get a loose opponent to call you with a lot of hands, it might be best.  But in that case, you are going to slow play the ace, bet on the turn and river, or on the river, to make sure your opponent doesn’t trap you with a better ace, and also to make your opponent think you don’t have the ace.  You can generally just check down a failed steal attempt, and maybe get one bet out of your pair of aces or kings.   It also may have value in moving all in from the button and small blind as a really short stacked, hoping to pick up the blinds, recognizing that KQ might call you, and that you will probably mathematically be able to steal enough to profit in the long run before your opponent has a strong enough hand to call you.

nonsuited connectors- These hands are usually good stealing hands with a deep enough stack. If you have a tight image, you can steal with hands like these. Also, you may choose to limp with most of the hands above (if not al) and then raise with hands like this to steal for deception. These hands are certainly not as strong as suited connectors, or even 1 gap suited connectors, but even so, it’s a hand that if you’re reraised and your opponnt does have a strong hand, you don’t really care. If you’re called, you can still have an okay shot at winning, and if you hit your straight or two pair you know your hand is probably good, and you might get a lot of chips.

1+2 gap suited connectors-These hands are also good hands to steal with at passive tables, even though that’s not as true at aggressive tables. If you get called, you have some value, and have potential to hit a big flop. You have the potential to hit open ended straight flush draws.  Any hand with a high probability to flop a draw with a decent chance of hitting is a good hand to represent strength. If the draw comes, you can semibluff against a passive table and build the pot up. Then if you hit, you can get paid off.  If you miss, just fold.

high suited 3 and 4 gap connectors (J7s, Q8s, K9s, ATs and even K8s, Q7s, J6s), Not the greatest hands in the world, and  if you don’t steal with these, that’s perfectly fine.  But they are hands that you have the ability to steal if you should choose because you are not going to get rereaised and can see a flop.  These are speculative hands that must be handled with care. They are dangerous hands that probably won’t give you the best opportunity to draw at the best hand, but you have several straigh possibilities and will have several potential backdoor draws, and you could hit a double bellybuster draw by the turn. These are really only hands you’ll want to use if you feel you can outplay your opponents after the flop as well by exploiting either too tight or too lose postflop, and/or passive tendencies after the flop, or if you feel stealing is just too profitable to not try to do it as often as you can. Aggression can make this hand profitable, and then slowing down and catching draws and taking free cards since the table will allow youwill make it playable.

high-medium 1, 2 and even 3 gap nonsuited connectors J9, J8, J7, QT, Q9, Q8, T7, KT, K9 – These hands are dangerous since you can’t hit as much, and a pair is usually not good, but because your table will allow you to control the action, these hands have some use, even though they are marginal. 

These are hands that have little value, they are not going to be great hands, and with all the other hands out their tha can be great steal hands, these probably shouldn’t be used often.  Save these and the high suited gap connectors for resteals and steals over limpers, or steals that require both preflop and continuation bets. Marginally profitable at best.

And possibly even some 1 gap unsuited connectors (86, 97) – These are hands that if you have absolute control over the table and really know your opponents, and maybe a faster blind structure or if you are short stacked, or if your opponents are just rock tight and never defend their blind you may consider stealing. Or if they are the most passive and loose players you’ll ever see, you may want to raise to isolate them, and check it don knowing that if you hit big you can get all of your opponents stack very easily but can bet based on the strength of your hand.

Passive tables give you the ability to steal a lot more, although it’s not a whole lot different in the sense that if you’re called you consider yourself beat, at a passive table, and if you’re raised you consider yourself beat at an aggressive table, the ability to come from behind and win occurs when you are not required to call a raise, making stealing at passive tables more profitable.  Because of this, you are free to speclate more and show aggression with much more marginal hands, and suddenly even if the steal itself isn’t profitable, the ability to check it down on a failed steal attempt makes playing the hand from start to finish profitable.

March 22, 2009

Irakechips.com

Filed under: General — Tags: , — blogger @ 4:55 am

So I’ve moved on, it’s time for bigger things. So onto my new tournament poker website at Http://irakechips.com

Full Tilt player notes classification system Part 2

Filed under: General, Psychology — Tags: , — MikeTheMavrick @ 3:22 am

In part 1 of the Full Tilt Player Notes Classification System… you classified players according to preflop tendencies.  You will now learn to classify players according to post flop tendencies. We will use the same general principals, identify whether the player is tight or loose, and whether he is passive or aggressive, then use the system to classify the player. Before the flop we used shapes. After the flop, we will use colors.

Tight Passive-Green. An opponent after the flop who plays tight passive is a green player. If they check you can bet, and take it down a reasonable amount of the time with a reasonably sized bet, or even a small bet.  Even if your opponent has a good hand, he will just call and continue to check it down, trying to slowplay. You are “go” to fire out a bet and take a stab at the pot against a green player.  Of course if he calls you, the yellow light better go up and you should procede with a lot of caution, and if your opponent then calls you again, the red light will come up and you better stop.

Loose Passive -Blue. A Phone Booth is Blue… So I think it is appropriate that the loose passive player (“calling station”) is blue.  This player is pretty easy, but you can’t just ire at every pot.  You want to free when you have a hand, otherwize just check it down and take somee freecards.   The stronger your hand is, the more closer to the maximum you should generally bet  (just don’t be too predictable about it).

loose aggressive – This opponent is dangerous, excersize caution. I had a dispute on whether to make the loose aggressive post flop player or tight aggressive post flop player yellow and which to make red.  The player who’s loose aggressive after the flop is more dangerous than a player who’s loose aggressive before the flop, because after the flop you can make up for an opponent’s mistakes. For example, if the player bets and raises every fhand before the flop but checks and folds after the flop, this player isn’t dangerous at all. But if a player gets reckless after the flop, you’re going to have to risk a lot of chips.  Often times the pot is already big and this player will keep on betting. You not only have to have a hand, but it has to hold up after several bets. You will have excellent implied odds against this player to ccall with a draw, but you have to ask yourself if drawing is really worth calling a bet on the flop, and possibly the turn, just to try to hit.   But although this player is dangerous, so is the tight aggressive player.  I also thought it would be confusing to categorize the “warning” signal preflop for the tight aggressive player, but then to have the “warning” symbol after the flop be loose aggressive. In order to avoid confusion, the octogon fits with the color of the stop sign, and the yield sign should be the color yellow.  Since Caution is represented by the loose aggressive player preflop, the color for caution should be used after the flop.  However sometimes it’s less risky to face the tight aggressive opponent because you can fire out a bet, and if you’re beat, you’ll know it, where you’ll probably have to risk a lot more chips to find out if you’re beat against the loose aggressive opponent.  The loose aggressive opponent is wild and unpredictable and plays sometimes like a maniac. The worst thing you could be is out of position, frozen against this player.  Just as being stuck in the wrong position in the middle of the intersection with stopped cars in front of you at a yellow light. So in a sense it’s a better representation because yellow lights can be more dangerous than red lights.  The red light you see, you just cautiously stop before you get in that akward not sure whether or not to commit, where the yellow light you may have very tough decisions on whether to speed up and go through by showing aggression and try to “out aggression” this player or even just call down the bluff, or hit the brakes quickly by folding the hand.

Tight Aggresive. The red light is in front of you, don’t go through it.  While it’s true at 2:30 am when there’s no cars around some people might just go through it, and say “no cop no stop”, and believe the risk is lower.  But most of the time, the risk is just not worth it to go through a red light, and if your opponent clearly shows the aggression, just “stop the car” and fold the hand.  Of course if you have the best possible hand and your opponent has shown aggression this opportunity is great. Now your opponent faces the red light without knowing it (your hand being good, and your chips getting aggressive) and now YOU are “go” because the red light is in your opponents face. Playing “red lights” are not tricky. You see them, you get out of the way, you see your opponent has the red light (you have the best hand, or your opponent checks), you go through. You also will be able to figure out where your opponent is at because his/her hand range is tight, especially if they are tight before the flop as well. But if they don’t show aggression, you are generally good to go.

There are several strategies for playing each player, but the biggest thing is that you actually pay attention to how your opponents play. Once you do that, you can learn to develop the strategies to beat each player, and once you have identified the general “shape and color” of the opponent, you know how GENERALLY to respond, but then you won’t have to spend as much energy trying to decide whether or not to play the hand, and how you are going to pick up chips, you just look at your players, see what you’re dealing with, and then you can find the weaknesses to attack.

Here’s a “homework assignment” for those looking to really get used to this system and be comfortable with using it to your full advantage:

Label all of the possible combination of players and start thinking about the best way to deal with them without having to take on a lot of risk.

Extra credit: Think of WHY a player might play that way, and what is his motivation (is he trying to see a flop, is he trying to catch bluffers, is he trying to wait for the best hand, is he trying to take down a lot of small pots, is he trying to avoid the small pots and only get involved in the big ones?)

Think of how that player might try to deviate from his image to deceive you (for example, a tight aggressive player after the flop who usually checks when he misses, and only calls on a draw, might be very tricky and decide to check to look weak, then raise, or check call, and then check raise the turn or river… Whenever a player deviates from the general playing style, this will also be going down in the notes.)

March 20, 2009

The IRC Method part 1 Laying The Foundation For Winning Poker Tournament Strategy

Filed under: IRC Method — Tags: , , — MikeTheMavrick @ 12:38 am

In the classic children’s book 3 little pigs ultimately the pigs were finally able to scurry away from their poor foundations, and find the house with the strongest foundation. The “Big Bad Wolf” was able to exploit the first 2 pigs mistakes who had poor foundations, but was unable to exploit the strong brick built foundation, and the pigs were finally safe.

While at first glance this seems to have nothing to do with poker, in fact it does. See every story with a moral, can be applied elsewhere.  So if you are going to play in a way that might seem “piggish” (trying to get EVERYONE’s chips as everyone is), you have got to base your play off of a solid foundation. Otherwise the “big bad De Wolfes” of the poker world, will blow your tower of chips down… sending you off looking to move in with your poker playing brother… who hopefully has a more solid foundation of play then you. If not, you’ll both be homeless looking for a distant cousin to move in with.

So whether you are looking to “move in” to the poker world for the first time, or “rebuild” your game, we must first start with the foundation.

The IRC (IRakeChips) method will use a method that doesn’t require TONS of experience for it to work, but works even better for someone with experience. So it must be flexible.  The experienced are going to be able to make adjustments, and use your read of the table and instincts to allow you to adapt properly if the situation dictates an adjustment. It seeks to have the least amount of risk overall by the time the tournament is over. Of course not taking a risk is sometimes risky as well, and skillful players such as John Phan, will look to get a big stack and make sure that anyone at his table is forced to take on bigger risks if they want to play.

However, this method is built on the understanding that the most skillful player will be able to avoid as big of risk and still be able to advance deep much more often than someone who is less skillful. But with a fast enough blind structure, even the best players will be forced to take on a lot of risk.

So not only does it this method need to adapt to the blinds but also the blind structure.

The strategy starts early on with the very basic hand selection regardless of blind structure. It will then show you how to adapt from there.

The fundimental raise strategy is rooted in mathematics. This should provide a strong enough foundation to build off of. First count how many people have entered the pot, or are left to act, and add one for yourself. Based on that information, IRC method raises with what appears to be the best hand. If there are 10 total players, any hand in the top 10% of hands is considered good enough to be on average the best hand.

This was covered in this post.

Here’s the basic “raise” chart”

10 players total: 88+, a9s+, KTs+ QTs+ AJo+ KQo+

9: 77+, a9s+, KTs+ QTs+ ATo+ KQo+ (add in 77 and AT)

8: 77+, a9s+, KTs+ JTs+ ATo+ KJo+ (Add in KJo and JTs)

7: 77+, AT+,KJ+QJ+,JTs+,QTs+,K9s+,A7s+

6: 55+,A5s+,AT+,KT+,QJ+,JTs+,Q9s+,K9s+

5: 55+, A4s+, A9+,Kt+,QT+, JT+, T9s+, J9s+,Q9s+, K8s+,

4: 44+,A2s+,A7+,K9+,QT+,JT+, T8s+, J8s+, Q8s+, K6s+,

3: 22+,A2s+, A5+, K8+,Q9+,J9+,T9+,98s+,T7s+,J7s+,Q6s+,K4s+,A2s+

2: 22+,A2s+,A2+,K5+,Q7+,J7+,T8+,98+, J4s+,Q2s+,K2s+,A2s+, T6s+,96s+,86s+,67s,56s,

With this chart, the player recognizes that opponents may sometimes have a better hand. When faced with a reraise, the assumption that you have the best hand is no longer valid. We start with the assumption that this player has a better hand then our range of hands.  But we will insure this strategy so that If our opponents reraise us too often, we will still reraise enough to make back everything we had to give up by folding, asuming the “standard” 3x raise.

Here is the standard Re-reraise chart, (also sometimes called the 3-bet) chart:

10 players total:
rereraise: TT+, AKs (sometimes not TT)
9:
rereraise: TT+, AKs
8:
rereraise: 99+, AKs
7:
rereraise: 99+, AKs, AQs,(ak)
6:
REREraise: 99+, AKs, AQs, AK
5:
REReraise: 99+ AKs, AQs, AK | AJs, KQs
4:
REREraise: 88+,ATs+,AQ+,KQs
3:
REREraise: 88+, ATs, KTs, QJs, AJ+
2:
reReraise: 66+,A9s,AT+,KJ+,JTs+,QTs+,KTs+

Now we must also know what hands to reraise with when there is a raiser that has raised before we could act. So we assume our opponents raise the same way that we do. So we must reraise with exactly half of the hands we would raise with, so that every single hand we play is better than our opponent.

Here is the chart in it’s entirety.

If you follow this chart, whether in cash games, or tournaments you will find yourself doing pretty well. As your skill improves you will be able to recognize when to deviate from this chart and play the player. If your opponents raise more often than they should according to this chart, you can reraise more often as your hand will be good. In addition, you can open up more in late position against passive opponents, as your improved skill will allow you to outplay your opponent by making better decisions after the flop.

There is one school of thought that advocates starting out extremely loose aggressive and to just try playing lots of hands rather than playing it safe… the argument goes that “although you may lose, you will gain experience which will be more beneficial in the long run, and since you can’t be good, at least be dangerous.”

To some extent I agree, but I believe it is more important to gain experience later on in tournament, and unless you plan to play a lot of tournaments, you’re going to gain more experience LATE in tournaments by starting out tight.  Don’t worry, you will see there will certainly be a time to break out, and play a lot more hands, and there are also going to be several moments as you get better where you will deviate on that strategy just based on weaknesses you pick up. You essentially are playing your cards, until you notice something about your players that you can exploit, and often times your cards won’t matter, but we’ll get to that later.

The chart is not an exact guide, but a good general guideline to consider. The main reason I bring this chart up again, is because this chart will be modified constantly based on your skill and your number of blinds remaining along with your opponent’s avg stack. I have come up with a very mathematical formulaic approach, that you will usually follow, but I want you to learn to deviate from this number based approach as you get better. The better you are, the more you can fold to big pots with hands that might be best, because you know that you will still be able to continue to accumulate a lot of chips without taking on a large risk of busting out. So in addition, to this strategy you will make other moves when the situation is right, sometimes without caring about your cards, and other times, you will fold even though you probably have the best hand, just because you know you will get those chips eventually without needing to risk putting yourself in a spot where you would get close to elimination on only a slight edge, if you happen to lose.

But this chart is definately great as a fundimental chart that any newbie could pick up and do okay. If you are completely new, I reccomend playing tighter preflop, especially in the early stages, and loosen up and make larger raises in the middle/later stages. Generally you are more likely to get action online, so playing tighter and raising larger amounts of chips less often, usually will work anyways for anyone.

As I said, this is just a starting point to the IRC method. Next you will need to be able to identify certain players, and go after them regardless of your hand. This fundimental chart will provide you with a solid image, and a few additional hands won’t cause you to get too out of line, nor will it ruin your image of being a tight player.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress